.png)
.png)
Reality capture, custom GIS workflows, and interactive delivery for the people pushing the edge of what geospatial data can do in the field.
I work best with people who are genuinely curious about what the data can do. Licensed surveying, reality capture, and custom GIS workflows for projects where the approach is still being worked out.
As a licensed surveyor, I make sure the data meets actual accuracy standards, not just looks right on screen.
Interactive 3D models let anyone on a project explore the site from a browser. Fewer site visits, faster reviews, better conversations.
Custom workflows cut out the repetitive setup work so your team spends time on the decisions that actually require judgment.
Project data delivered through a browser link, not a proprietary viewer. Anyone on the team can open it and actually use it.
Interactive 3D models from real projects. See what the data actually looks like when it's delivered.
View My WorkCustom workflows built around the decisions your project actually needs to make. Whatever tools you're already using, I can work within them, extend them, or build something purpose-built.
See ServicesEvaluate. Terrain analysis, corridor review, and site questions answered with a custom workspace tuned to your specific landscape and decisions.
Design. Analysis outputs formatted as clean, usable deliverables: maps, reports, and data ready for the next stage of your project.
Field. Spatial data packaged for field coordination: the right layers, the right format, ready for the people doing the work on the ground.
Stakeholder Review. Interactive 3D models and web-based deliverables so anyone on the project can actually see the site, not just the GIS team.
I'm looking for people who want to figure something out together, not just hand off a scope. Here's who that usually is.
Teams exploring how reality capture and terrain data can replace or augment traditional site review, and what that makes possible for permitting and field work.
Designers who want better terrain tools and are willing to try approaches that haven't been standard practice yet.
Practitioners who want to know what a site actually looks like before anyone drives out, and want documentation that holds up through the whole project lifecycle.
Existing conditions capture and precise terrain data your engineers can actually build on, with the accuracy documentation to back it up.
Organizations building toward spatial data practices that don't exist yet in their field and looking for someone who can help figure out what that looks like.
That's the kind of conversation I want to have. Tell me what you're working on and what you're not sure can be done.
Start a Conversation